Cambodia: MEF & MIFA Debt Fund-04

Date Filed
11 Jul 2024
Status
Open
Phase
Assessment
Country
Cambodia

Case Tracker

Eligibility
July 11, 2024-October 28, 2024
Eligibility
Assessment
Status as of July 12, 2024
Assessment
Dispute Resolution
Compliance
CURRENT Status
Assessment
Status as of July 12, 2024

Complaint Overview

Complainant

Confidential

Concerns

Predatory lending practices, loss of livelihood, loss of income generating property, possible land loss, food insecurity, threats and intimidation, additional informal loan burden, reduction or loss of educational opportunities, and child labor.

Cross-Cutting Issues
Children Coercion Loss of Livelihoods Violence / Abuse

Project Information

Region
East Asia & the Pacific
Institution
IFC
Name & Number
IFC Project Numbers: 27827 & 31467
Company
KB Prasac Bank Plc (Prasac) and LOLC Plc. (LOLC)
Sector
Financial Institutions

Synopsis

Project Overview

IFC, in collaboration with the german development bank Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW) and the Development Bank of Austria (OeEB), created a global Microfinance Enhancement Facility (MEF) in 2009 to support microfinance institutions worldwide that may face funding shortfalls during periods of unprecedented financial stress. At the time of investment, IFC aimed to support over 100 microfinance institutions operating in more than 30 countries, including over 20 IDA countries.

In 2010, IFC established the Microfinance Initiative for Asia Debt Fund (MIFA), also with KfW and OeEB, to increase access to finance for micro-borrowers and low-income households across East Asia, South Asia, and Central Asia. The facility aimed to offer market-based debt financing, with an emphasis on local currency and longer-term financing, to microfinance institutions (MFIs), particularly those that are smaller or less developed.

Action

In July 2024, CAO received a complaint concerning KB Prasac Bank Plc (Prasac), a MEF client; and LOLC Plc. (LOLC), a MEF and MIFA client. The complainant raised concerns about the harmful effects of the lending and collection practices on their family’s livelihood and social well-being. The complaint alleged that the complainant faced threats and intimidation from project employees, leading to the loss of livelihood and income-generating property, as well as potential land loss. They also claimed that food security and access to education for their children were impacted, with child labor becoming a consequence. Additionally, due to pressure from credit officers, the complainant borrowed from informal lenders, resulting in a higher debt burden due to high interest rates, which they are now unable to repay.

Status

The case is currently under assessment.

Status as of January 30, 2025.

Mailchimp Survey

 

We Value Your Feedback

Thank you for visiting CAO’s new website. Help us improve your experience by taking our short survey.

Give Feedback No thanks