Guatemala: Marlin-01/Sipacapa

Date Filed
01 Jan 2005
Status
Closed
Phase
Assessment
Country
Guatemala

Case Tracker

Eligibility
Eligibility
Assessment
Closed
Assessment
Dispute Resolution
Compliance
CURRENT Status
Assessment
Closed

Complaint Overview

Complainant

Colectivo Madre Selva

Cross-Cutting Issues
Indigenous Peoples Water

Project Information

Region
Latin America & the Caribbean
Institution
IFC
Name & Number
Marlin 21766
Company
Montana Exploradora de Guatemala S.A.
Sector
Mining, Oil, Gas and Chemicals
Department
Other
Category
A
Commitment

$45 million

Synopsis

Complaint

The Marlin open-pit gold and silver mine is both owned and operated by Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S.A., a subsidiary of Glamis Gold Ltd. In January 2005, Colectivo Madre Selva, a civil society organization, lodged a complaint with CAO on behalf of the Indigenous Peoples from the municipality of Sipacapa with the following concerns:

1. The project would reduce community access to local water supplies, contaminate local waterways and cause adverse social impacts;

2. The project was developed without adequate and timely consultation of Indigenous Peoples.

Action

The mine has been the focal point of considerable controversy both within and outside Guatemala. In particular, the lack of an identifiable party that was both neutral and credible prompted distrust and uncertainty within local communities. In March 2005, CAO appraised and accepted the complaint. Furthermore, CAO commissioned an independent technical review of the project’s environmental documentation. The assessment report was completed in September 2005, subsequent to which two follow-up missions were conducted in October 2005 and February 2006.

Status

In relation to the environmental risks asserted by the complaint, the assessment report delineated the fact that CAO did not consider the Indigenous People of Sipacapa would be significantly impacted by the project. As such, CAO recommended a participatory process of ongoing dialogue and consultation in pursuit of conflict resolution. CAO also emphasized that enhanced participation by local people in progressive decisions concerning future exploration, royalties, environmental monitoring and benefit distribution would be constructive to promoting dispute resolution. The complaint was closed in May 2006.

Case Documents

  • Complaint & Assessment

    Complaint
    Letter of Complaint
    Jun 01, 2006
    English
    Letter of Complaint
    Letter of Complaint
    Jun 01, 2006
    Spanish
    Letter of Complaint
    Statement
    Jun 01, 2006
    English
    Statement
    Assessment Report
    Assessment Report
    May 01, 2006
    English
    Assessment Report
    Assessment Report
    May 01, 2006
    English
    Assessment Report
    Madre Selva Response to CAO Assessment Report
    Sep 25, 2005
    English
    Madre Selva Response to CAO Assessment Report
    Madre Selva Response to CAO Assessment Report
    Sep 22, 2005
    Spanish
    Madre Selva Response to CAO Assessment Report
    IFC Response to CAO Assessment Report
    Oct 01, 2005
    English
    IFC Response to CAO Assessment Report
    Assessment of complaint submitted to CAO
    Sep 07, 2005
    English
    Assessment of complaint submitted to CAO
    Annexes of complaint submitted to CAO
    Sep 07, 2005
    English
    Annexes of complaint submitted to CAO
    Assessment of complaint submitted to CAO
    Sep 07, 2005
    Spanish
    Assessment of complaint submitted to CAO
    Annexes of complaint submitted to CAO
    Sep 07, 2005
    Spanish
    Annexes of complaint submitted to CAO
  • Mailchimp Survey

     

    We Value Your Feedback

    Thank you for visiting CAO’s new website. Help us improve your experience by taking our short survey.

    Give Feedback No thanks